Home » 2015 » June

Monthly Archives: June 2015

Help!

Problem? Check out the OLS Knowledge Base or open a ticket by emailing support@cuny-ols.libanswers.com.

Automatic barcode loading and activation in Aleph

The beginning of the semester brings to the library thousands of new students who need to activate their barcodes in order to use library services. What if we told you the loading of active barcodes could be automated?

To begin, you need to first sit down and consider the details:

How frequently will barcodes be loaded into Aleph?

The answer to this question varies campus to campus. For example, the School of Professional Studies (SPS) tends to have a more frequent student turnover population, so an ongoing load of barcodes (such as weekly or monthly) has more advantage. A campus with a more traditional semester structure may be satisfied with loads at the start of the semester. However, even this merits discussion: Should the patron load include barcodes only once at the start of the semester or also include a second load two weeks later (for students registering late)? Should it be just the Spring and Fall, or also include the Summer?

Keep in mind that it would not be techncally possible for daily loads (due to the sheer size of our university). However, we already have weekly loads. Patron loading is scheduled in the off hours as as not to interfere with other batch processing, such as loading/updating bibliographic records, and various patron notices.

Who will be included in these loads?

The scope of the patron load should consider whether to have students loaded just at the start of their academic career at your institution, or loaded every year. Repeatedly loading students every semester will overwrite any changes manually made by staff over time. If someone gets a new ID card, their barcode will be corrected. The update of the barcodes cannot be blocked, so a patron’s barcode will revert to whatever is on record by the ID office.

Would freshmen be loaded both semesters or just when they are new? Would it include summer semester students, who may be taking only a single class? Should the load instead only include people who have been issued a new ID card within the past seven months (for incoming students as well as those being re-issued ID cards)?

What role do barcodes play in authentication on your campus?

The way barcodes are used for authentication varies campus to campus. Some libraries use it for access to electronic resources. Some security staff screen patrons for access based on the ID card.

Does the campus provide an ID with a unique barcode already printed on the card?

The barcode to be loaded should appear on the ID card. (How else will students or barcode readers know what their barcode is?) What if a person has multiple campus relationships (potentially two or more barcodes) and prefers a certain barcode to be their main, active barcode? How would a library manage a situation where someone has their campus’s barcode overwritten each semester (while the individual would rather retain a barcode from a different campus)? Staff will then have to create two accounts for a patron, and does your library wanting to take on manually maintaining the second account?


These considerations vary greatly across the CUNY libraries so please discuss them internally before beginning any work. When you’re ready to proceed, designate someone from library as the point person on this project. The next step will be for this person to open a work order with these specifications. This will be followed by contacting the various other groups involved, and continue to manage follow-up for this project. This includes dialog with the campus staff that manage barcode IDs and IT/CIS.

What is recommended?

The Office of Library Services recommends loading only incoming students (new freshmen and transfer students) OR people who have been issued new IDs within the past seven months. (Seven months is based on understanding the patron loading cycle details.) This will eliminate lines at service desks for 99% of new students. Over time, the majority of students will be covered. This would be a large increase over the current estimated 50% of a campus’s students having a barcode entered. Any subsequent changes would be a more rare exception, and, once corrected by staff, these changes/corrections would be preserved.

OLS has a separate request for changes pending to improve the way that patrons are imported from CUNYfirst. This includes loading patrons 7 to 10 days before the start of a semester, and improving the identification of a primary campus relationship (Home Library). Until this is in place, we do not have a way to only load barcodes when it is a patron’s home campus.

Open Trails

Back in November of 2011, the CUNY University Faculty Senate passed a Statement and Resolution on Open Access – a resolution which supported the establishment of a CUNY-wide open access institutional repository and which has been a guiding document in the development of that repository, from its collections policies to its mission and goals:

CUNY Academic Works is a service of the CUNY Libraries dedicated to collecting and providing access to the research, scholarship and creative work of the City University of New York. In service to CUNY’s mission as a public university, content in Academic Works is freely available to all.

CUNY Academic Works aims to:

  • Provide centralized, public access to the scholarly and creative output of the students, faculty, and staff of the City University of New York.
  • Promote research and collaboration within and between the twenty-four campuses that make up the City University of New York, as well as the larger public.
  • Preserve the history and development of the City University of New York.

While the mission and goals of Academic Works are clearly stated, it’s understandable that the first steps to meeting them can feel a little uncertain. Therefore, in order to support the Libraries as we embark on the trail to a more open CUNY, the Office of Library Services communicated three actionable goals for our first 18 months:

  • In 6 months, 50% of institutions will have at least one collection in the repository
  • In 12 months, 100% of institutions will have at least one collection in the repository
  • In 18 months, CUNY Academic Works will have 15,000 items representing diverse content types and disciplines

Sound familiar? OLS has been busy getting the word out about Academic Works since the kick-off this March, and, less than four months later, CUNY Libraries has met its first goal. In fact, we passed it. Thanks to the commitment and hard work of CUNY librarians, eighteen (count ’em, 18!) of twenty-four institutions have their first collections in the repository within four months. And these initial collections have us well on our way to meeting the 18 month goal; they include 2,500+ items spanning from traditional journal publications and monographs to data sets, student work, open educational resources, and archival collections that capture the history of the University.

CUNY enters the scholarly communication landscape at an exciting time. It’s a time that some find reminiscent of the wild west (and it certainly has its good, its bad, and its ugly), but it’s also a time in which CUNY has the opportunity to pioneer the way.

CUNY Libraries prepare to enter the ild west of academic publishing.
CUNY Libraries prepare to enter the wild west of academic publishing. Eighteen of the campus libraries are trained and ready to go, with more on the way soon!

Useful Information regarding Fiscal Year End (FYE)

Are you new to acquisition’s Fiscal Year End process? At a loss for what to do in Aleph to make sure you’ve got everything set up correctly? Check out the checklist on the OLS Support Site:

http://support.cunylibraries.org/systems/aleph/fiscal-year-end

Also included on this page are related Aleph reports that you may want to check out.

The Current State of E-Resource Usage Data in Libraries

Here’s an informative and sobering assessment of employing COUNTER (via SUSHI or not) stats for accurately measuring cost per use at the platform/database/journal level… It’s not a pretty picture.

Welker, J. (2012). Counting on COUNTER: The current state of e-resource usage data in libraries. Computers in Libraries, 32(9). Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov12/Welker–Counting-on-COUNTER.shtml.

Thanks to Roland for sending this my way.